Sunday, February 28, 2016

Confusing 1 Corinthians 6 with Romans 13


Editorial Commentary

Khen Lim


Image source: blog.gaycatholicpriests.org
In 1 Corinthians 6, Paul suggests that when two Christians have a legal dispute, they should settle it without taking their case before an unbelieving judge to arbitrate.
Civil cases are inherently different from their criminal counterparts. A crime represents a danger to society, meaning that it must be reported to law enforcement agencies according to Romans 13. This means the investigation, arraignment, hearing, sentencing and incarceration are all within the authority of the government.

For example, if you knew that a leader in a church is a sexual predator preying on young and defenceless Christian youths, Paul says you will be doing the right thing to call the cops because society considers such a person to be dangerous. In this sense, none of us would be doing the right thing concealing or ignoring it ‘to protect the reputation of the church.’
In view of these lessons from Paul, how does one explain why, for more than a century, the Catholic Church hid cases of child sexual abuse away from public view and scrutiny but did nothing to redress the complaints? When pressured, the Vatican simply relocated the predator priests where many of them repeated their crimes all over again.
Sexual crimes do far more damage to individuals and society than the Catholic Church understands. It’s one thing to compel the victims not to ever speak to the public again but it’s quite another to leave them un-compensated and the crimes unaddressed.  
It’s time to look at Romans 13 again.


No comments:

Post a Comment