Sunday, June 05, 2016

TEN Reasons Why Some Churches Stay Small

While big isn't everything, small without good reason isn't good too

Khen Lim




Image source: christianitytoday.com


Whatever the size, God loves all His churches and for all intents and purposes, there’s much going for small churches. Like a compact car that is great as a city runabout but limited for long-distance tour-ing, some small churches should only remain small for the right reasons. Let’s look briefly at ten reasons why they should not:
I have personally attended large and small churches here and back in Australia and in most cases, my experiences have been generally good. For example, a Chinese church near where I presently live grew in leaps and bounds over the few short years. From one building, they have sprouted several. They even have a basketball court of their own, right in the middle of a pagan-dominated Chinese village!
On the other hand, there are small churches that struggle more than others. For them, it looks like the more they try, the more they seem to regress and the harder it appears. The dividends don’t seem apparent regardless of the effort they expend.
Before I go on, I want to qualify the word ‘grow’ here. Growth doesn’t have to refer purely to a numeric value. In other words, it doesn’t have to be about size alone. At any rate, big isn’t always good and small isn’t always a failure. Therefore in this context, to grow is to reach people for the sake of Christ, to share the Gospel with them and to pave the way for them to accept His salvation.
For example, if you reach out and maybe even start new churches, your local church might not expand in numbers but it certainly is ‘growing.’ Conversely in a small town with a declining population, a church that stays the same size could be said to be ‘growing’ as well albeit in a different way. Growth must, therefore, be seen from different contexts depending on the situation.
Perhaps therefore, we could consider ten possible reasons why churches otherwise remain small no matter what they do (and don’t do):

1. Resolutely small
Image source: lifegivingwaterdevo.org
“I like my church small,” some might discretely say. Some churches have an exclusive ambience but a subtle one. They don’t like change or interruption. They like things the way they are – status quo. Everything is so perfect that they see anything different – like a newcomer – as, perhaps, a bit of a threat.
Newcomers feel the snub when they discover the information is often hard to find and not many people seem keen to help. When a church is set up on a first-name basis, newcomers won’t know who John or Frank or Robbie or Beth is. For that matter, if there are five different people called Mike in the church, how would a newcomer know to go to? And who is Mike anyway?
Or when the congregation is noticeably made up of impenetrable cliques that are all but impossible to join in. Of course, none of this is apparent during the service. It is only after church is over that the newcomer may find it an uphill challenge to mingle if or when he suddenly finds that people have huddled into their own little cliques, impervious of whether or not anyone else is interested to join in. Everyone seems so impatient to get together and talk that they fail to notice how to welcome someone new into their own little world.
Because these are not overt signs, all these issues can go unnoticed. When newcomers find they have to make so much effort on their own just to orientate themselves to a church’s programs and activities to the point that they are forced to learn who those who are in charge are (and not the other way around), that is not healthy for any church of any size, let alone a small one.
While this alone does not necessarily sink a small church, it is a troubling source of problem that can be very damaging.

2. High pastor turnover
Image source: theatlantic.com
Churches that frequently swap pastors can’t be a good thing. Before getting comfortable with one, you find yourself unsettled and have to go through the same process again with a new pastor.
In one Anglican setup I know, the choice of pastor is decided by a domineering and influential family who believe they own the church and therefore, have the right to wield more power than anyone else. All it took for one pastor to be forced out was to ‘offend’ the family over the issue of the worship ministry. Inevitably, he was thrown to a small town where apparently, he and his family are actually happier and more at peace with themselves.
In this real-life example, the family has been running the rule over the whole church for decades and it doesn’t appear to have waned in recent times. With the head of that family being a well-known lawyer and all his children having pretensions of following him into the law firm, there is no sign that they will loosen their grip over the poor church.
In another church with over half a century of history, more than two dozen pastors have come and gone over a gamut of issues, large and small. Many a times, the pastors could not see eye to eye with the elders or the deacons, resulting in a stand-off that, out of sheer pride, no one cared to resolve. Leaving things the way they had become, inevitably conditions became too untenable for the pastor to continue. Over time, many other pastors underwent the same ordeal, resulting in one resignation after another.
Over those years, it was not difficult to see that, this had turned into an instability within the church that was impossible to hide any further from the congregation. In time, it proved to be a stumbling block to actual growth manifested in ugly fights over ministry leadership where different egotistical families struggled to elbow their children into position or accusations over poorly-managed programs levelled at those who felt unfairly victimised or people getting overly sensitive and personally offended by the pastoral direction, believing that the pastor was giving them a dressing down at the pulpit.
In time, it wasn’t just the pastors who left or were forced to be replaced but also the members who found the whole experience, so unpalatable.
Like they say, ‘a rolling stone gathers no moss.’

3. Monopolisers rule
Image source: ffoz.org
A friend of ours whose family recently migrated to New Zealand tells us that the church they attend has a dynastial rule presided by a married couple who reportedly make all the important decisions plus finance without being contested. Needless to say, the choice of pastor was also theirs to make.
At one time when the church was pastor-less, the husband put out their feelers looking for a replacement but the requirements were so lofty and unrealistic that it was next to impossible to fulfil. Many people apparently worked out that this was just a scheme for him and his wife to control the pulpit and of course, to tailor the messages according to how they like.
In time to come, the family led by the husband ‘volunteered’ to ‘take care’ of the pastor-less congregation while the search was on but the search was never going to be successful and eventually, the married couple set themselves up as the unrivalled authority and it did not take long for autocracy to set in. The longer the church allowed this to continue, the more entrenched the autocratic couple became.
From there, only a few steps separated them from ultimately controlling everything in the church where they defined the direction, established the initiatives, indulge in whatever ventures and determining what is and isn’t good for the future of the church.
And eventually too, those who found this much to their distaste left, often with nary a whimper for fear of being persecuted. Meanwhile such a church will always stay small because it is easier for autocratic leaders to exert their control and influence.
But when good people leave the church, there remains that lack of courage to stand up and question the very things that need to be questioned about the leadership such as, “Why was this done?” or “Who else was involved in the decision that took the church in this direction?” or even “Why aren’t the church members involved or informed?”
Autocratic church leaders cannot stand to be questioned. Therefore, when a congregation stands up to ask for accountability, they have nowhere to hide or go. Painted to a corner, such leaders may reply, “You won’t understand” to which you should then say, “Try me.”

4. Untrustworthy leaders
Image source: weheartit.com
If a church finds itself wrangling over the pettiest of details concerning finances or even simply arrangements, then this is a case of members not trusting their leaders. The same distrustful looks can take place even in committee meetings where the nature of the bickering makes it obvious.
In one small church I had come across many years ago, the treasurer told me how he was always forced to account for every cent spent in the monthly statements. This tediousness was obviously tiresome to deal with since church positions have always been on a voluntary basis. The treasurer found herself asking why she even bothered to take up the responsibility. Predictably, the ones who showed such distrust were often those who never wanted to be elected to positions of responsibility. That way, they could squarely aim at any of the leaders with impunity.
In another church, the dissension between the young and the old spilled over to a fight over the quality of the worship services. The leaders who appointed the young musicians and decided on the worship program were chastised by many among the older congregation for ignoring their worship needs. In return, the young musicians accused the older church members of refusing to learn new song materials.
In another church, the fight over money became so bad among the committee members and the leaders that some upright elders decided to come together and wrote a cheque to cover the shortfall just so that they did not have to go on enduring the strife that was threatening to tear them apart.
When stuff like this happens, it’s difficult to see a small church moving forward as for every step it takes to move forward, something will invariably drag it back a few.

5. Not good enough
Image source: pinaytravelista.com
Inferiority complex is a difficult one to shrug off for small churches. It doesn’t take much to bring ruin to vulnerable churches. It can be caused by meagre finances, nonchalant pew warmers, the lack of skilled manpower etc. Any of these can be used as an excuse that a small church is just not big enough, not experienced enough, not skilled enough, not resourceful enough or simply not good enough to get anything worthwhile done.
The small church has the feeling it can’t muster enough to get their act together because they’re not big enough to make any appreciable impact. A small church with an inferiority complex or a compelling sense of negativity often finds itself paralysed with myriad inabilities no matter which way it looks at things. Nothing will ever work for them. Not even if they tried. The ‘been there, done that’ attitude is both frustrating and insufferable.
Worse is when small churches compare enviously with their larger counterparts. Unsurprisingly the larger churches will compare in the same vein to the mega-churches. This unhealthy comparison brings up two possible outcomes – it offers excuses not to even bother trying or it drives out whatever self-confidence that is left – and in both cases, we forget about Christ.
So I think the key to it all is to ask Jesus, “What would You have us do, Lord?” Remember when Peter asked, “Lord, what about John here? What do You want him to do?”
Jesus’ answer was a beauty – He said, “What is that to you? You follow Me!”

6. No oars, no rudder
Image source: eccsj.com
Stagnation in a small church isn’t just about the numbers. It’s also about a sense of loss and of being aimlessly wandering with no plans to go and no aims in sight. “We do what we can,” one might say but ‘what we can’ is often limited because their vision holds no hope.
The Bible offers us clues as to how we identify our priorities (Acts 6:1-4, NLT) as a church:
“But as the believers rapidly multiplied, there were rumblings of discontent. The Greek-speaking believers complained about the Hebrew-speaking believers, saying that their widows were being discriminated against the daily distribution of food. So the Twelve called a meeting of all the believers. They said, ‘We apostles should spend our time teaching the Word of God, not running a food program. And so, brothers, select seven men who are well respected and are full of the Spirit and wisdom. We will give them this responsibility. Then we apostles can spend our time in prayer and teaching the Word.’”
The verse helps us to see where the real priorities lie. It wasn’t in the food program but instead, the big picture was to invest in the ‘Word of God’ through ‘prayer’ and ‘teaching the Word.’ The question then is what is the focus of the small church that is allegedly stagnant? 
When I checked the Internet to see what leaders believe are the problems with small churches that do not grow, many point to a lack of focus. Small churches, they say, need to train their efforts on the one or two things they do very well in and excel in them. Clearly therefore, the problem is trying to be everything to everyone.
So if a particular small church is very good with certain ministry work, then that is where it should focus on and that must be the direction it should head towards. Some small churches are actually very good with teaching while others may be in worship or community work. Whatever it is, the gifting is of God’s and the Lord’s message might be visible but well under our noses and we’re too blind to see.

7. Spiritually unhealthy
Image source: danburrell.com
Unhealthy practices in church are known to happen and none are immune to them. However when it happens in small – and vulnerable – churches, the effects may be more critical because it may cause irreversible destruction.
Practices that are widely accepted as unhealthy for churches include constant changes in pastoral leadership, acrimonies among the leaders and/or the congregation, never-ending bickering that may turn sour with dangerous repercussions, vacuous and needless rumour-mongering among the idle-minded and harmful politicking that threatens to split the church and so on. Perhaps these are churches that have forgotten about Romans 12.
Paul in Romans offers a great blueprint for church-building and management. We can see this in three parts in chapter 12.
The first two verses tell us to ‘be a living and holy sacrifice; the kind He will find acceptable’ instead of mimicking the conduct of the world. Rather we should be allowing God to ‘transform you into a new person by changing the way you think.’
In verses 3 to 8, Paul encourages us to identify our place of service and take it up responsibly so that we may then utilise the spiritual gifts that our gracious God has given us in ‘serving others’ and to ‘serve them well.’
And then in verse 9 to 13 and in fact, all the way to the end of the chapter, the apostle outlines the relationships within a healthy and loving fellowship of believers:
“Don’t just pretend to love others. Really love them. Hate what is wrong. Hold tightly to what is good. Love each other with genuine affection and take delight in honouring each other. Never be lazy but work hard and serve the Lord enthusiastically. Rejoice in our confident hope. Be patient in trouble and keep on praying. When God’s people are in need, be ready to help them. Always be eager to practise hospitality.”
A congregation that is committed to Christ in more than just lip service is always one that is spiritually healthy. A small church that is demonstrably using spiritual gifts that are divinely given in the Lord’s service will empower a fellowship that is sweet, active, loving and devoted.

8. Questionable fellowship
Image source: vanderbloemen.com
Some churches make it difficult to feel loved and there may be more reasons for this than we assume.
Cliques in church may engender comfort among selected portions of the congregation but for newcomers, they are alienating and non-inclusive. Because cliques are self-serving, visitors may be ignored and then, follow-ups are not done. Therefore people can be made to feel cold and unwelcome.
Fellowship quality in church isn’t well served if the programming for church services is monotonous and remain unchanged for too long. Everything becomes a mere obligation to fulfil and the feeling of mechanical clockwork orderliness is overwhelming. Things are done only because they have to be done. Worship services are too predictable and lifeless and there is no effort made to enliven them. There is no joy in the faces of the congregation during services. Everything looks as stale as a one-year-old slice of bread.
Small churches that allow this to happen will see their numbers decline, let alone grow, leading to fallow grounds with no effort to want to bear good fruit (Jer 4:3, Hos 10:12).
The key feature of any fallow ground is that it is unproductive and the reason lies in the hard crust that makes up its uppermost surface. This hard crust would require more than just deep ploughing to loosen and then turn the soil over but it will also demand highly laborious effort just to prepare it in readiness for any planting to take place.
Small stagnant churches can be like fallow ground especially if its congregation lacks meaningful fellowship steeped in real love, which should remind all of us of Jesus’ words in John 13:35 (NLT), “Your love for one another will prove to the world that you are My disciples.”
What Jesus says is that those of us who are close to Christ will know to love one another in deep fellowship. What this means is that a congregation that is void of love is so removed from the Lord (James 4:8) that it cannot be in anything but a backslidden state.

9. The rot has set in
Image source: christianitytoday.com
In many parts of Australia, I have seen once-great churches become corporate offices. Some of them have turned into occasional Sunday flea markets and the odd local computer bazaars. The beautiful stained glass are still there but the significance of the building as houses of God has since been lost.
Lately in America and also in Europe, disused and abandoned churches have been taken over by Muslims who after destroying the crosses in and around its buildings, then turn them into mosques. You can read plenty of this on the Internet. Even Wikipedia has an entry specifically on this infamous topic.
Jane Perlez in her April 2007 article in The New York Times called, ‘Old Church Becomes Mosque in Uneasy Britain,’ writes,
“In areas that have experienced Muslim immigration such as parts of Europe and North America, some church buildings and those of other religious congregations, that have fallen into disuse have been converted into mosques following a sale of the property. In London, the Brick Lane Mosque has previously served as a synagogue.” 
Churches in disrepair show strong signs that the rot has begun to set in. This is physical negligence and can appear in many forms. Apart from unpainted walls and neglected weathered surfaces, it can also be threadbare carpeting, a piano that has seen better days, torn cushions and worn-out chairs. The roof might be leaking and lights no longer work but no one cared to replace them.
However, the word ‘disrepair’ isn’t just about physical negligence although that in itself is unacceptable. Churches that are in spiritual disrepair would be very indicative of a decay that is even more significant than its exterior appearances. Evidence of this emerges when activities and programs are cancelled either because of lack of interest or outright poor attendances. In London, I visited a Methodist church that looked so beautiful on the outside but on a Sunday morning, there was less than a handful of members attending service.
A dying small church does not tend to its business. It is just left to die a lonely death. So when someone from such a church says, “They have a way of working out for the best,” believe me, it’s a disguised death wish to which you should then ask back, “Sir, your church is so uncomfortably close to death. Pray tell, do tell me how that’s going to work out for the best.”

10. No prayers, big worry
Image source: elev8.hellobeautiful.com
In 1 Samuel 28:6, Saul was complaining that no matter how hard he tried, God didn’t seem to listen to his prayer but it didn’t occur to him that it was he who set into motion his rebellion against the Lord. On the other hand, in Luke 18:2-8 (NLT), Jesus told His disciples to never give up praying, by telling them a story:
“There was a judge in a certain city…who neither feared God nor cared about people. A widow of that city came to him repeatedly, saying, ‘Give me justice in this dispute with my enemy.’ The judge ignored her for a while but finally he said to himself, ‘I don’t fear God or care about people but this woman is driving me crazy. I’m going to see that she gets justice because she is wearing me out with her constant requests!’”
Jesus then explained in verses 6 to 8, saying, “Learn a lesson from this unjust judge. Even he rendered a just decision in the end. So don’t you think God will surely give justice to His chosen people who cry out to Him day and night? Will He keep putting them off? I tell you, He will grant justice to them quickly! But when the Son of Man returns, how many will He find on the earth who have faith?”
As it is, a small church is already thin in numbers and if there is no desire to pray strongly as well, then there’s little to be said about its future. Basically if a church doesn’t pray or doesn’t encourage her congregation to pray, what then? If no one in church bothers to turn up for prayer meetings, then what? If the pastor of the church invites members to come forward to be prayed for and no one does, how then?
A prayer-less church is a church worth worrying about. That’s like running a car across a desert with an engine that is about to give up the ghost. In either case, survival is wishful thinking.

New wineskin for new wine
In Mark 2:21-22 (NLT), Jesus asks His disciples, “Who would patch old clothing with new cloth? For the new patch would shrink and rip away from the old cloth, leaving an even bigger tear than before. And no one puts new wine into old wineskins. For the wine would burst the wineskins, and the wine and the skins would both be lost. New wine calls for new wineskins.”
Tackling any of the ten reasons given here doesn’t guarantee growth in a small stagnant church. It might help but it might not be enough. And that primarily is because each small church has its own unique problems that may require a different level of understanding and possibly, a more exquisite approach.
However these ten reasons might wake us up to put a check on any problem that might threaten to run away from our church. It might come at the right time to stop the rot and put a halt to the otherwise demise of a perfectly good church. And in that sense, I encourage you to consider these reasons and how they may offer food for thought as to invocation, self-examination and deep reflection. Pray that God will inflame your heart’s desire to be deeply and sincerely prayerful.





No comments:

Post a Comment