England Condemns Her Faire
Gospeller to a Fiery Death
On This Day June 18 1546
Khen Lim
Emma Stanfield as Anne Askew in The Tudors TV series about to be burned alive (Image source: Cinemorgue Wiki)
On July 16 1546, a very tired and near-to-death 26-year-old
Anne Askew sat on a wooden chair perched up on a stake. Below her were kindling
gathered around and next to her were three other stakes all spaced apart. Her
friends, John Lascelles, Nicholas Belenian and John Adams, fellow Protestants
were all tied firmly with rope. In a matter of minutes, in the market square of
Smithfield, all of them would be burned to their death.
Unlike her friends, she was placed on a chair; from what her
torturers had done to her body, there was no way she could even walk let alone
stand tied to the stake. Her injuries from the racking had been so horrific
that all her limbs were either broken or dislocated.
In fact she became known
as the only woman to be tortured in the Tower of London and the ordeal she went
through was torrid enough that the Constable of the Tower, Sir Anthony Kingston
(1508-1556) walked out of the room and refused to proceed with the torturing.
Yet that didn’t stop the others from continuing.
Like many martyrs of Christ, Anne Askew paid for her faith
with her life but in hers was something truly exceptional. For all the days
that she was tortured before she was burned to death, Anne did not reveal any
names that would have meant serious trouble for her Protestant friends. The
pain she suffered was so intense that her screams were heard in the garden next
to the White Tower by the Lieutenant’s wife and daughter who were taking a
leisurely walk.
Anne’s story is one of exceptionalism in which she not only dared
to question the doctrine of transubstantiation but did it face to face the Lord
Mayor of London. When he chided her, saying, “You foolish woman, do you say
that the priests cannot make the body of Christ?” she gave back as good as she
got: “I say so, my Lord; for I have read that God made man; but that man can
make God, I never read nor I suppose, ever shall read.” And with that, she
basically sealed her fate.
To her, however, this was not a game but an
affirmation of where her heart was at. Her persistence in light of threats of
torture, in answering her opponents arguments were purely done with clear
references to Scripture, which she had no worthy competitor in the same room.
Anne’s crime was that she did not hold to the Catholic’s view
that the Lord’s Supper was literally the body and blood of Christ and like all
Protestants, she believed it to be symbolic.
“But as touching the holy and blessed supper of the Lord, I
believe it to be a most necessary remembrance of His glorious sufferings and
death. Moreover, I believe as much therein as my eternal and only Redeemer,
Jesus Christ, would [that] I should believe. Finally, I believe all those
Scriptures to be true [which] He has confirmed with His precious blood,” she
said.
By now, she confronted her own beliefs in deference to
whatever threats that her opponents forced upon her. In her book entitled,
‘Divorced, Beheaded, Survived: A Feminist Reinterpretation of the Wives of
Henry VIII,’ author Karen Lindsey said, “Anne no longer attempted to evade
admitting her own beliefs.
She treated transubstantiation as a joke. Of course,
Jesus has said He was the bread of the Eucharist. He had also said He was the
door to Salvation – did that mean He was present in any door a priest chose to
bless? She was courting martyrdom and on June 18, she was condemned to die at
the stake.”
Winding back the twenty-six years, to the year 1520, Anne was
born in Lincolnshire to Sir William Askew, a notable landowner who served in
the court of King Henry VIII. In fact, her family has interesting ties with the
royal court with her brother Edward as the king’s cupbearer and elder brother
(Sir) Francis, the sheriff of Lincoln on three occasions. Being well educated,
she was no less a noblewoman even at her young age.
Some historians suggest
that when she was young, she was impacted by the Protestant ideas that her
brothers brought home from Cambridge where they studied. However, the family
was conservative and in light of the 1537 Pilgrimage of Grace, her father was
in opposition against the rebels.
Pilgrimage of Grace (maryannbernal.blogspot.com)
The Pilgrimage of Grace began in October 1536 as a popular
uprising against King Henry VIII and his decision to sever ties with the Roman
Catholic Church as well as the Dissolution of the Monasteries and then too, his
chief minister Thomas Cromwell’s (1485-1540) policies among others.
It was in
fact a very serious rebellion, the Yorkshire uprising was “a spontaneous mass
protest of the conservative elements in the North of England angry with the
religious upheavals instigated by King Henry VIII.” Some believe that it was
this event that gave reason to Anne to turn her back on the old Catholic
religion because she witnessed the rebels attack her home and seize her
brothers.
At roughly the same time, a certain Sir Thomas Kyme (b.1517),
a staunch Catholic, was betrothed to Anne’s elder sister, Martha but when she
suddenly died, her father forced her hand as a replacement in marrying him.
Needless to say, it was hardly a happy marriage made worse so because of
religious incompatibilities where Kyme’s traditional Catholic views clashed
with Anne’s progressively strong Protestantism.
Catherine with her husband Charles Brandon in The Tudor TV series (Image source: Pinterest)
She could have spent much of
her early married years with her other sister, Jane, whose husband, Sir George
Saint Paul (1562-1613) was not only an English politician but an avid
Protestant as well and through his friendships with Charles Brandon (1484-1545)
who was a brother-in-law to the king, and his wife Catherine (née Willoughby),
she was amply exposed to the reformed views.
In around that time, starting from 1538, through Henry VIII’s
decree, the English Bible was finally accessible to the common man to read so
long as it is in the churches. Therefore those with Protestant persuasion were now
able to read for themselves what God said as opposed to what they were told
were His words.
More remarkably, this was the first time that normal people
were able to seize the opportunity available to them to carry out Bible
readings and then share their evangelical views. Times were a-changing and
there was a movement in England away from the Roman Catholic Church and those
whose leanings were towards a reformed view plunged heart and soul into it.
Anne was most assuredly one of them.
But that only lasted five short years as Henry VIII reneged on
his own pledge in 1543. The English Parliament removed William Tyndale’s
English version Bible and all public reading of Scripture by laymen from common
practice. In the process, he enacted a ruling that would prevent men “below the
rank of gentlemen” including all women
from being able to access and read the Bible.
May that be the case, people like
Anne were more than charged up to be undeterred. She continued to share her
views and preached since by then, she and others had memorised Scripture. As it
often was the case, the banishment only made the likes of Anne more fired up to
share with those who were deprived of the chance to read God’s Word themselves.
Anne’s fiery devotion and outspoken zeal wasn’t something that
her husband, Kyme, could cope with, let alone her refusal to take up his family
name. In all her writings, she referred to herself as “Anne Ayscough (or even
Aiscough),” which was the more authentic Tudor version of what is now widely
known as ‘Askew.’ No matter what, she never identified herself as ‘Anne Kyme.’
Anne’s substantial interests in theological studies had by now
begun to surface. Although access to the Bible was eventually revoked for
women, she had by then affirmed her belief in Protestantism and after much
diligent study of the Word through her many hours of reading Scripture, she
embraced the principles of Reformation and devoted herself completely to it.
The expanse of not just her biblical knowledge but of the law was well evident
in her writings and in it, her wit, intellect and courage were also very
obvious. These, she showed her tremendous hand in her subsequent interrogations
that were to come towards the end of her life.
Seen to be completely at odds with his staunch Catholicism,
the cracks on the wall soon forced the marriage to collapse. With advice from
his local clerics, Kyme evicted her from their family home even though he
accepted the fact that she was without a doubt, the “most devout woman he’d
come to know.”
Though records show she had two children through the marriage,
there are no information concerning what ever happened to them in the process. The
Dictionary of National Biography merely says that Anne had left her children to
go ‘gospelling’ but more about this a little later.
Following her eviction, she went to live with her brother
Francis. In fact, Kyme’s forced separation opened a convenient way for Anne to
finally seek divorce from what was, all this while, an unhappy marriage that
was forced on her against her will. Citing “unequal yoke” would be, in her
mind, an incontestable reason and a firm basis for the divorce to be validated.
Like Henry VIII who found divorce tough enough to engineer, Anne had felt the
same too. Unlike him, she hardly had the national stature to make things happen
her way.
Catherine Parr as portrayed by Joely Richardson in The Tudor TV series (Image source: Pinterest)
After her local court threw her petition out, she left for
London where she believed a divorce would be easier to obtain possibly because
she felt the king would empathise and understand her situation. Like Henry’s
new wife, Catherine Parr (1512-1548), Anne admired the king’s desire to
liberate his subjects from “the evil of popery” and therefore she was sure that
he would pave the way for her to be freed from her own unbelieving husband and
her unhappy marriage.
Anne’s time in London was a significant turning point. Though
divorce was hard to come by, it became a larger problem for her than she’d
realised. In the meantime, it was in this city that she caught up with an old
friend, John Lascelles who then introduced her to other high-profile
Protestants like Huge Latimer the Bishop of Worcester (1487-1555), Nicholas
Shaxton the Bishop of Salisbury (1485-1556) and then Dr Edward Crome (d.1562).
These were very notable who’s who in England because of their connection to the
new Queen of England whose Protestant leaning was becoming evident.
In their company, Anne not just flourished; her faith in
Christ blossomed along with the electric climate of reform that she sensed in
London and with friends like these, she was happier than she ever had been.
Soon, she emerged as London’s most promising and beloved gospellers and with
her evident beauty and intelligence, Anne was widely known as the ‘Faire
Gospeller.’
A gospeller was someone who knew large parts of Scripture by
heart and was able to preach about them. At that time in the city of London,
Bible study groups were everywhere and they were filled with people of all
walks of life; from the nobility to the commoner, from the high to the low, men
and women; all who revered God’s Word were welcomed and attend, they frequently
did with a great heart for Christ.
Even the ban that came back into effect on
Bible reading did not deter such people but instead, it fuelled their zeal for
God’s Word and those who knew Scripture so comprehensively well like Anne,
became ‘gospellers’ and spelled a new era and breed of lay preachers in this
country.
Of all of London’s gospellers, Anne was possibly its most
famous. It wasn’t just the power of her conviction but the passion in which she
delivered her knowledge of God’s Word. As she found her home in London,
Londoners found in her a young gentlewoman who felt equally at home sharing
Scripture with the wealthy and the poor as well as the educated and the uneducated.
But not all of London was smitten with someone like Anne. In a
toxic religiously antagonised climate created by Henry VIII’s attempt to annul
his marriage to his wife, Catherine of Aragon (1485-1536), it was now a case of
traditionalist Catholics against what they see as their deadly enemy, the
reformed Protestants. To those who embraced the traditional Roman Catholic
Church, every Protestant was a heretic. It was only a matter of time that they
would flush all of them out. And burn them.
Bishop Stephen Gardiner played by Simon Ward in The Tudors TV series (Image source: The Tudors Wiki)
With Anne becoming a very public and much celebrated figure,
she was obviously making enemies with someone like Bishop Stephen Gardiner
(1483-1555) who later became Henry’s eldest daughter’s Lord Chancellor during
her reign as Mary I. For him, it was the new queen, Catherine Parr, whom he was
aiming to cut down to size. He needed some thing or someone to discredit her.
And someone like Anne could fit the bill if only he knew of her connections.
Unbeknownst to him, Anne wasn’t just an outspoken heretic who was turning
London upside down but she was also friendly with the Duchess of Suffolk,
Catherine Brandon (1519-1580), whom she’d met in her early days in London. And
the Duchess was, of course, a good friend of the new queen.
1546 being the last year of Henry VIII’s reign (he died
January the following year), Anne was right in the middle of a religious crisis
that was clearly spiralling out of control. Mixed in a crowd looking for reform
and being so well embraced, it’s possible that Anne wasn’t aware because within
the royal courts, the struggle between the traditionalists and the reformers
was as real as it was deadly.
And Gardiner was within its epicentre. For three
years up until then, the traditionalists’ strategy was to round up minor
evangelicals and threaten them enough for them to sing. The idea was that they
would inevitably spill the beans and lead authorities to those higher up the
rank.
This resulted in some “legally bizarre and clearly desperate”
actions but it did lead to some notable people who were brought in for
questioning including Anne’s own brother, Edward who was one of the Archbishop
of Canterbury Thomas Cranmer’s servants. Nicholas Shaxton, a curate for
Cranmer, was also rounded up to pressure Edward to renounce his Protestant
faith.
And then there were also Rowland Taylor (1510-1555) and Richard Turner
(d.1565). Although both were unharmed, Taylor was eventually arrested during
Mary I’s reign in 1553 and two years later, was burned at the stake. Turner was
more fortunate as he managed to go into exile at that time.
Thomas Wriothesley played by Frank McCusker in The Tudors TV series (Image source: The Tudors Wiki)
Gardiner’s council of traditionalists were a fearsome lot.
There were the unscrupulous conniving Sir Thomas Wriothesley (1505-1550) and renowned
torturer and morally inept Sir Richard Rich (1496-1567), both of whom were
widely known to have turned the wheels of the rack in the eventual torture of
Anne.
Together with Edmund Bonner (c.1500-1569) and Thomas Howard the Third
Duke of Norfolk (1473-1554), they went about cracking down on Protestant
sympathisers and those who held favourable opinions that brought disrepute to
the Catholic faith. They also went about threatening the lives of reformers
such as Miles Coverdale and Hugh Latimer. In fact, they were determined to
flush out every single Protestant that they suspected within the confines of
the royal household to the extent that they even intimidated Cranmer.
But their single biggest agenda was to find incontrovertible
evidence to bring down the queen. That was, after all, the strong suspicion of
the Catholic faction that Queen Catherine (Parr) had influence over the royal
children with her heresy. However, because it was too difficult to implicate
her directly, they decided to work through the queen’s ladies-in-waiting and
those close friends who shared the same Protestant opinions.
They included the
queen’s younger sister, Anne Herbert (née Parr, 1515-1552), Duchess of Suffolk,
Catherine Brandon (née Willoughby, 1519-1580), Duchess of Somerset and reformist
sister-in-law to Henry VIII’s third wife, Anne Seymour (née Stanhope,
1510-1587) and Countess of Sussex, Anne Calthorpe (c.1505-1582) and possibly
also the queen’s lady-in-waiting Lady Joan Champernowne (née Denny, c.1505-553)
whose husband was also an evangelical at court.
A prisoner cell in the Tower of London said to be the type Anne Askew was incarcerated in (Image source: Pinterest)
Anne suffered through two interrogations before her execution.
Her first was in March 1545 when the aldermen of London arraigned her under the
charge of the Six Articles Act, which meant she had to appear before a heresy
hearing commission. There she stood trial, cross-examined by the chancellor of
the Bishop of London, Bonner himself who was of course part of Gardiner’s mob.
Following the inquest, Anne was imprisoned for twelve days before her cousin
Brittayn was able to visit and bail her out but during her brief incarceration,
she was pressed for a confession to which she gave the authorities no pleasure.
From June of the same year to early 1546, Anne had again run
foul with the law but none of these were of much significance because
authorities could not find enough incriminating evidence to pin on her. The
turning point, however, was when she applied unsuccessfully for divorce.
In
dismissing the case, the court compelled her to return home but her refusal to
comply was probably what brought her to Gardiner’s attention and in his
curiosity to dig more into the matter, the Bishop had her re-arrested in March
1546 just so he could examine her more closely.
Although she was, again, released, he forced her back to
London three months later in June where he not only ordered her repatriation to
her husband but more importantly, questioned her on the state of her faith.
Richard Rich played by Rod Hallett in The Tudors TV series (Image source: Tudors Wiki)
This
time, she was subjected to two five-hour-long periods of interrogation by Lord
Chancellor Wriothesley, Solicitor-General Rich Gardiner as well as the Bishop
of Winchester, John Dudley (1504-1553) and also the king’s principal secretary,
Sir William Paget (1506-1563). All of them took turns to pressure Anne into
confession with threats of execution.
Their objective had long been the same –
to force names out of her, names of important Protestant sympathisers that
could possibly be running the gamut within the royal courts.
When they finally failed, she was taken for torturing, with
the ultimate hope, this time, that she would name Queen Catherine as the practising Protestant; in other
words, a heretic whose hands have been in the lives of Henry’s children.
From
her prison cell in the Tower of London, she was hauled off at around ten in the
morning to a lower chamber in the White Tower. There, she was shown the ominous
rack and then asked, once again, if she would utter the names of those who shared
in her Protestant faith. And once more, she refused to comply.
This time, Anne was asked to undress down to her shift (what
we call a chemise or modern-day underwear) before getting on to the rack where
her wrists and ankles were then tied down. And again, her torturers asked her
the same question. She chose to be silent.
Woodcut of heretic tortured on the rack in the Tower of London (Image source: Spartacus Educational)
At this point in time, the wheel of
the rack began to turn for the first time and she was stretched so much so that
her whole body was held tightly arched about five inches off the bed. According
to her own writings, the pain was so excruciating that she fainted, after which
they lowered her body and revived her.
They repeated the torture on Anne twice more until the
Constable of the Tower of London, Sir Anthony Kingston, had enough of it,
walked out of the room, leaving for the soonest possible meeting with the king
where he sought to pardon himself from having to torture her any further and to
inform him of the unspeakable cruelty.
For Kingston, seeing Anne – or any woman
for that matter – in such writhing inhuman pain was too much. The king
acquiesced but that didn’t stop Wriothesley and Rich from continuing to torture
her themselves.
In fact, unlike Kingston, Wriothesley and Rich set no limit to
themselves as to how much pain their victim could endure. They turned the
handles so hard that Anne’s joints popped from their sockets. The forced
dislocation meant that her shoulder, hip, elbows and knees were of no use to
her anymore. The excruciating pain would have to be unimaginable. No human
should have to go through something this torturous.
Yet for all the unthinkable
agony that Anne was forced to undergo, she mentioned no names. However her
shrieks had reached the garden next to the White Tower where Kingston’s wife and daughter were taking a walk. The Lieutenant, probably no longer
able to withstand the inhumanity of the torture, ordered that Anne be returned
to her prison cell.
Anne Askew's remembrance in the Tower of London (Image source: Flickriver)
On this day four-hundred and seventy-one years ago in 1546,
Anne was found guilty of heresy. The authorities might as well just throw the
book at her now, since they no longer found her useful. After all the torture
they subjected her to, they still could not extract any useful information from
her and therefore, through the condemnation of heresy, they ordered that she be
executed in Smithfield in broad daylight alongside other fellow Protestants.
There, she would be burned alive at the stake, watched by a gathered public
that is, until or unless she finally recanted. Her last day on Earth would be a
month from then.
The consistency of Anne’s resoluteness is beyond human
comprehension. Through all the pain that she suffered on the rack, most normal
human beings would have conceded. Many, when seeing the instrument, felt it
enough to spill the beans and not wanting to go through the torture.
But not
Anne. She availed herself to the torture – not gleefully of course – and
emerged even more powerful in her compelling show of resilience. Had she named
any names, the most sought-after of them all would have to be none other than
the queen herself.
Queen Catherine Parr, Henry’s sixth, was a remarkably gentle,
considerate and thoughtful woman. It was Catherine who got her off the first
time she was arrested. That was not too difficult for someone like her to
intercede but once Anne became even more persistent and fiery in her beliefs,
her subsequent rearrests became too dangerous. By then, Catherine’s enemies
were out baying for her blood. It’s only fortunate that she outlived Henry thus
ensuring her survival.
Anne Askew being carried to the stake in The Tudors TV series (Image source: tvfanatic.com)
On July 16 in the year 1546, four people were escorted to the
stakes at Smithfield – Anne herself and her friends and fellow Protestants,
John Lascelles, Nicholas Belenian and John Adams. While the others could,
Anne’s multiple injuries meant she failed to walk on her own and so she was
carried in a chair all the way to the stake by the guards of the Tower, wearing
just her shift.
Even so, every physical movement in the slightest would cause
intense pain to shoot through her body. Through the journey to Smithfield, her
screams would have been terrifying to hear.
When she arrived in Smithfield, the guards dragged her off the
chair and to the stake. There, she was sat astride on a small wooden seat in
order that she could be held up and supported. She was then chained around her
ankles, knees, waist, chest and neck.
Anne Askew perched on a chair at her stake in The Tudors TV series (Image source: Spartacus Educational)
All of these were completely redundant
for a woman who had no further use of her physical body since all her joints
had been comprehensively dislocated. But still, the authorities probably wanted
to make a gory example out of Anne. Her recalcitrance was more than enough of a
reason to have her burned alive slowly instead of the usual prior strangulation
before being set on fire.
All four were set apart but were visible of one another since
they were in the same area. The crowd was huge and had to be pushed back in
order that the fire could consume only the four. At the very last minute, Anne
was given her final chance to renounce her faith but still, she refused for all
of them and in the same tone, the other three echoed agreeably.
Lindsey writes,
saying, “As the faggots were piled high about them, Wriothesley made his way
through the throng to offer the four a pardon if they recanted. Anne spoke for
them all, crying aloud that she ‘came not hither to deny my Lord and Master!’”
Scene from The Tudors showing Anne Askew being burned at the stake (Image source: thetudorswiki.com)
Lindsey went on to say, “The torch was lit and the four died
quickly thanks to gunpowder a friend had thrown into the flames.” Mention of
gunpowder was common among even early historians. James Gairdner (1828-1912) said
that after Wriothesley and the Dukes of Norfolk and Bedford as well as the lord
mayor and others were seated at the bench under St Bartholomew’s Church,
following Dr Shaxton’s sermon, some members of the public became agitated and
uncomfortable because they noticed some gunpowder was too close for comfort.
“The titled spectators on the bench were more discomposed,
knowing that there was some gunpowder near the faggots, which they feared might
send them flying about their ears. But the Earl of Bedford reassured them. The
gunpowder was not under the faggots but laid about the bodies of the victims to
rid them the sooner of their pain,” Gairdner wrote.
In the BBC series ‘The Tudors,’ one of the episodes relate how
Lady Stanhope (née Seymour) had arranged for a pouch of gunpowder to be sown on
to Anne’s shift as an ‘act of kindness’ so that rather than linger in
sufferance of a long horrible death, she would die a quick death. This was
clearly also proof of the close friendship between the two.
In another account,
the gunpowder was said to be tied around her neck. Famous martyrologist John
Foxe confirmed in his book that indeed gunpowder was present to “rid them of
their pain,” which is not only further validation that it was used but that it
was not just for Anne but also for the other three. In yet another account,
gunpowder was ‘poured’ over her body but by who, nobody was certain.
Despite all these accounts, it was also said that the
execution had gone on for about an hour and that Anne was actually unconscious
but remained alive for fifteen minutes. So rather than the quick death that
gunpowder would have brought on, this couldn’t have been the case. Had there
been gunpowder used, there would have had been a sudden explosion once the
flames reached the sack of gunpowder on her body. Furthermore, the execution
couldn’t then have lasted for the hour mentioned.
Anne Askew and three others in Smithfield for their execution (Image source: Ex-Classics)
After Anne had drawn her last breath, the sky broke into a
thunderstorm. Eighteenth-century ecclesiastical historian John Strype (1643-1737)
recalls it to be “the voice of God, or the voice of an angel.” Lindsey said, “a
fortuitous thunderstorm, breaking out suddenly, added to the legend that grew
to surround the death of the Fair Gospeller.”
Bishop John Bale (1495-1563) wrote,
saying, “Credibly am I informed by various Dutch merchants who were present
there, that in the time of their sufferings, the sky, and abhorring so wicked
an act, suddenly altered colour, and the clouds from above gave a thunder clap,
not unlike the one written in Psalm 76. The elements both declared wherein the
high displeasure of God for so tyrannous a murder of innocents.”
As the public looked on, most were in awe of Anne’s bravery.
It was recorded that she neither cried out nor scream in pain that was, until
the flames began to lick at her chest.
Foxe wrote, “And thus the good Anne
Askew, with these blessed martyrs being troubled so many manner of ways and
having passed through so many torments, having now ended the long course of her
agonies, being compassed in with flames of fire, as a blessed sacrifice unto
God, she slept in the Lord A.D. 1546, leaving behind her a singular example of
Christian constancy for all men to follow.”
Even as Anne neared certain death, there was still the one
final chance to walk away. Lesser men would have recanted just like Bishop
Shaxton who was now ironically the one who not only preached at the pulpit to
her and the three others but was also offering her one last chance at pardon.
His attempt was futile though Anne did listen attentively at his sermon,
agreeing when he said the truth but exclaiming, “There he misseth and speaketh
without the book” when he strayed from the truth of Scripture.
Emma Stanfield as Anne Askew in The Tudors TV series (Image source: theanneboleynfiles.com)
Today, in 1546, Anne was burned alive by the order of King
Henry VIII but her death was not in vain. Foxe included her in his book of
martyrs while many Baptist history records consider her as their forerunner.
Anne’s heroic stand was as incredible considering that she was only 25 years of
age.
Just as she led an amazing life testifying for God, she died with that
same courage and faith that so many had known her for. Despite having been so
unjustifiably and cruelly treated in the Tower of London, Anne remained true to
Christ and loyal to her friends whose lives were saved by her refusal to reveal
to her tormentors. And in that, she continues till this day to be a person many
around the world admire.
Further sources for reading:
- Bainton, Roland H. (Jan 1973) Women of the Reformation: In France and
England (Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Fortress Publishers). Available at https://www.amazon.com/Women-Reformation-England-Roland-Bainton/dp/0800662474
- Beilin, Elaine V. (Jan 1996)
The Examinations of Anne Askew (Women
Writers in English 1350-1850) (New York: Oxford University Press).
Available at https://www.amazon.co.uk/Examinations-Askew-Writers-English-1350-1850/dp/0195108493
- Cattley, Stephen Reed, ed.
(Aug 2011) The Acts and Monuments of John
Foxe: With A Preliminary Dissertation By the Rev. George Townsend, Volume 5
(Charleston, SC: Nabu Press). Available at https://www.amazon.com/Acts-Monuments-John-Foxe-Dissertation/dp/1175009431
- Christmas, Rev. Henry (1849) Select Works of John Bale… Containing the
Examinations of Lord Cobham, William Thorpe and Anne Askew and The Image of
Both Churches. Edited for the Parker Society (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press). Available at https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/008591077
- Cross, Claire (2013) Participants in the Pilgrimage of Grace
(act. 1536-1537) in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography Online Edition.
Subscription required to access online. To login, http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.oxforddnb.com/subscribed
- Deen, Edith (1959) Great Women of the Christian Faith (New
York: Harper, First Edition). Available at https://www.amazon.com/Great-women-Christian-faith-Edith/dp/B0006AW47Q
- Foxe, John () Book of Martyrs. Accessible online at http://www.hrionline.ac.uk/johnfoxe/index.html
- Freeman, Thomas S. and
Wall, Sarah Elizabeth (2001) Racking the
Body, Shaping the Text: The Account of Anne Askew in Foxe’s ‘Book of Martyrs’
in Renaissance Quarterly Vol. 54 (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
Accessible online at http://gracewood0.tripod.com/foxefreeman.html
- Gairdner, James (1885) ‘Askew, Anne (1521-1546)’ in Stephen,
Leslie () Dictionary of National
Biography 1885-1900 Volume 02 (London: Smith, Elder & Co.). Also in
Jokinen, Anniina, ed. (Jul 2010) Luminarium
Encyclopaedia website. Accessible online at http://www.luminarium.org/encyclopedia/askew.htm.
Also available at https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Askew,_Anne_(DNB00)
- Hickerson, Megan L. (Apr
2006) Ways of Lying: Anne Askew and the
Examinations in Gender & History 18 Nr. 1 (Wiley Online Library).
Accessible online at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-0424.2006.00414.x/abstract
- Ives, Eric (Jul 2005) The Life and Death of Anne Boleyn: ‘The Most
Happy’ (Carlton, VIC: Blackwell Publishing, New Edition). Available at https://www.amazon.co.uk/Life-Death-Anne-Boleyn-Happy/dp/1405134631
- Lindsey, Karen (May 1996) Divorced, Beheaded, Survived: A Feminist
Reinterpretation of the Wives of Henry VIII (Boston, MA: Da Capo Press).
Available at https://www.amazon.com/Divorced-Beheaded-Survived-Feminist-Reinterpretation/dp/0201408236
- Loades, David, ed. (Jun 2003)
Reader’s Guide to British History
(Reader’s Guides) (Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge). Available at https://www.amazon.com/Readers-Guide-British-History-Guides/dp/1579582427
- MacCulloch, Diarmaid (Feb 1998)
Thomas Cranmer: A Life (New Haven,
CT: Yale University Press, Fourth Print Edition). Available at https://www.amazon.com/Thomas-Cranmer-Life-Diarmaid-MacCulloch/dp/0300074484
- Merle D’Aubigné, Jean
Henri (Jun 1997) The Reformation in
England – Volume 1 (Edinburgh, Scotland: Banner of Truth Trust). Available
at https://www.amazon.com/Reformation-England-J-H-Merle-dAubigne/dp/0851514863
- Parsons, Robert (Mar 2012)
A Treatise of Three Conversions of
England from Paganisme to Christian Religion, Volume 2; Divided in 3 Partes
(RareBooksClub.com). Available at https://www.amazon.com/treatise-conversions-paganisme-Christian-religion/dp/113017719X
Note:
Because this copy may lack certain typos and texts, a free scanned copy of the
original book (without typos) can be downloaded from the publisher by the
purchaser).
- Porter, Linda (Mar 2011) Katherine the Queen: The Remarkable Life of
Katherine Parr (London: Pan Books, Reprinted Edition). Available at https://www.amazon.co.uk/d/Books/Katherine-Queen-Linda-Porter/0330460803
- Ridgway, Claire (Jun 2010)
Anne Askew Sentenced to Death in The
Anne Boleyn Files website. Accessible online at https://www.theanneboleynfiles.com/anne-askew-sentenced-to-death/
- Tracy, Stephanie (Jul
2012) The Burning of Anne Askew in
The Tudor Enthusiast website. Accessible online at http://thetudorenthusiast.weebly.com/my-tudor-blog/the-burning-of-anne-askew.
- Watt, Diane (Nov 1997) Secretaries of God – Women Prophets in Late
Medieval and Early Modern England (Library of Medieval Women) (Woodbridge,
Suffolk: D.S. Brewer, New Edition). Available at http://www.amazon.in/Secretaries-God-Prophets-Medieval-England/dp/0859916146
- Weir, Alison (Jan 1991) The Six Wives of Henry VIII (New York:
Grove Press, First Grove Press Paperback Edition). Available at https://www.amazon.com/Six-Wives-Henry-VIII/dp/0802136834
- Zahl, Paul F. M. (Jun 2001)
Five Women of the English Reformation (Grand
Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company). Available at https://www.amazon.com/Five-Women-English-Reformation-Paul/dp/0802830455
No comments:
Post a Comment